Jesus worked to bring people together: Samaritan and Jew, Greek and
Roman. He practiced an open table, rich and poor, male and female. He
challenged unjust boundaries and rules.
That is what got him killed!
The Empty Tomb
20 Now on the first day of the week Mary Magdalene went
to the tomb early, while it was still dark, and saw that the stone had
been taken away from the tomb
There has been a particular question that has always been
there since the first “followers of the way” started to become a new way of
viewing the life and death of Jesus of Nazareth. That question must be “is it
true”? It relates to the Easter story
as it has become known of an empty grave. The other issue is how does this
relate to the Passover period of the Jewish calendar to which the three gospel
writers point in their varying liturgy’s of who Jesus was and how he related to
Jewish traditions.
With regards to the first question that one I will leave you
to decide for yourself, as a title in the most recent inquirer says “does it
matter if Jesus was raised from the dead or not?” To some extent the truth
behind the resurrection is not the issue, as I started to think of a message
for today I was interested to note however that all four writers of the Gospels
agree one thing and that is Women and the most named on of these is Mary
Magdalene went to the tomb with intent to administer spices to the body.
In a study by Craig
Evans on Jewish burial customs at the time of the Gospels, he writes-
“It is further concluded that it is very probable that
some of Jesus’ followers
(such as the women mentioned in the Gospel accounts) knew
where Jesus’ body had been
placed and intended to mark the location, perfume his
body, and mourn, in keeping with
Jewish customs. The intention was to take possession of
Jesus’ remains, at some point in
the future, and transfer them to his family burial place”
This then would confirm Mary the Mother of Jesus being
present as consistent with the custom of moving Jesus to the family grave
later.
Did they find and empty grave as the liturgies of the
gospels record? That question presents itself again. I am still not going to
attempt to answer it, that’s your choice.
But I want to turn to the backdrop to the Easter Story and
that is that it is said to have occurred at the time of the Passover according
to three gospels. Now to put the life of Jesus in context we must remember his
gospel recorded year of ministry is related to the Jewish calendar, and the
Gospels especially Matthew Mark and Luke are written as liturgical statements
to explain how the early “followers of the way” of Jesus fitted his way in with
the observances of the Jewish calendar of major festivals. So it is not
automatically an actual account of time and day, but a way of viewing the
festivals on reflection. The gospels are all written at least some 60 years
after the events, and are centered probably on the time of the destruction of
the Temple CE 70 in Jerusalem. The three gospels who put Jesus in a place of a
Passover celebration are written before the “followers of the way” are excluded
from being a sect among Judaism while the Gospel of John is written later and
so has less relation to the Judaist teachings sensitivities.
Now the point of all this preamble is that when Jesus
partook of the seder meal or Passover meal with his disciples it is sometimes
lost how significantly different it was to a traditional Jewish Passover meal.
The clue to this is found not in the Gospels we have mentioned but in the
Gospel of John clarified by the Letter to the Corinthians, in John we have the
Cup God has given me and in Corinthians the words and After Supper he took the
cup.
The significance of this clarification in the letter to the
Corinthians helps us to see more in the Gospels about the Seder meal. In a
Seder meal there are actually 5 cups of wine, the first four are consumed
during supper and relate to the order (in fact the word seder means order) of
the Torah or Old Testament teachings about the laws of Jewish people.
In practice, the fifth cup has come to be seen as
a celebration of future redemption. The cup that is not drunk of after
Supper is that of the cup of Elijah who is said to return and drink the cup
when the Messiah comes to redeem his people.
If Corinthians is correct then Jesus took the cup of Elijah
and in so doing proclaimed him-self to be the incarnation of this Old Testament
prophet and the Messiah. Looking at the three Gospels written as liturgical
statements to accompany the Jewish year such a detail concerning tradition is a
little lost, but let us also remember such Gospels were written down by gentile
authors in Greek not Aramaic or Hebrew. Translation is not always clear, and
subsequent re writes and translations often miss points made originally. Bit
like Chinese wispers..
Further parallels with this mythical figure of Elijah follow
as the Story of Jesus is told, and some connections with John the Baptist are
also involved in the fulfillments of the expectations of this character of the
Old Testament. These are however not a literalism of Elijah but a similarity of
the spirit of Elijah to be seen in the coming of the man that some ascribe as
the messiah of the Jews.
Now the interesting thing about this character Elijah is
that he is important in a lot of other religions not just Judaism, he features
in ancient Paganism, he is extolled in Islam, he is part of Eastern folk law
and the founder of the Bah’I faith the Bab was said to be his reincarnation and
is buried on Mount Carmel where Elijah is said to have had a confrontation in
ancient literature. This character Elijah ends up in all manner of later
religions, from Rastafarianism to orthodoxy. He has had more returns than just
about anyone else.
Sometimes I rather wonder at people of faith who actually
expect some character to turn up from the past in a literalism. Just as that
person was they think they will be when they return. I don’t know how many of
you remember the Film those magnificent men in their flying machines?. If you
do. Think about those hilarious Germans trying to do everything by the book and
you have a comic picture of literalism in faith. The actual joy of flying is
lost to them as they struggle to find the right page in the book. Then without
the book they crash.
Remove literalism from your mind and look at the Gospel of
John and you will then see this particular Gospel as a narrative that seeks to
show a spiritual aspect of the Jesus portrayed. It is not like the other gospels constrained to traditional
Judaism and paints a picture of an emerging new church, not a “people of the
way” still a part of the old Jewish synagogue in the synoptics.
Johns Gospel is the new Church flying free of the
constraints of Judaism, it maps out a spiritualization of how the faith becomes
Universal not only a “way of doing Judaism”.
“The new faith must be built upon the old, It can not be
born except out the old. Religion always evolves by transcending the limits if
the past and giving birth to a new consciousness.” Says Bishop John Spong in
his book “Re-claiming the bible for the non religious world.”
The Easter message is this a celebration of the birth of a
new consciousness, seen in the Gospel of John as the story of the evolution of
Christianity, from an old religion that of “Judaism” to “the people of the way”
who after exile from the synagogues at the same time as the destruction of the
Temple in Jerusalem become the early church.
It s in Johns Gospel that the Physical resurrection is
strongest, but hang on this is not a book to be taken literally. Unlike the
other Gospels this book is written after the “followers of the way” of Jesus
had been expelled from the synagogues of the Jews. This is a book about flying
free from the constraints of the Old order, post seder you could say, for when
Jesus took of the cup of Elijah he ends the reign of an order of legalism.
This is a book about the new consciousness not the old
traditions, it gives a fresh insight into the misconstrued thoughts of the old
ways and brings to life the new. No wonder such symbolism as Eggs and new life
surround the Easter traditions that follow on from here on, in many ways they
reflect the old but in a new consciousness.
The problem is they become a tradition in themselves, shortly
after the “followers of the way” become bogged down in fresh legalism. Read the
epistles and you see this time and time again, look at the unholy rows
surrounding the establishment of Christianity as the state religion and it
becomes bogged down more and more.
The point about the resurrection is not did it happen but
does it happen in the lives of those people who seek to be a new consciousness
of a spirituality that promotes humanity to be compassionate, to promote
justice, to seek peace not retaliation and to care for one another and to put
others before yourself. These are just some of the things that the sermon of
the mount much loved by Unitarians is about. It is the life of Jesus reflected
in the gospels and the epistles, not the traditions of old interpretations that
count.
Any religion that is to be effective in doing good is not at
war with another one, it is no good being like those Germans in the film those
magnificent men in their flying machines, following every letter of the instruction
manual if you do not find yourself exhilarated by flight itself.
The Gospels and the Jewish festivals are great when put into
practice and flying. But we do not all have to follow these to be working
together for the good of humanity. Looking at instruction manuals for flying an
early bi plane will not help you to fly a modern airbus. Thank goodness that is
not the case,, can you imagine heathrow with planes being piloted by people
reading an old manual on flying a bi plane. Id rather not, it’s a ridiculous
scenario.
Equally ridiculous to my mind is following to the letter
what worked in ancient times. We need to be able to step forwards. We are an
evolved people we need an evolved interpretation and most of all we need to
fly, not literally but spiritually. “To step beyond traditional religious
thinking into a new consciousness”. This is what the old traditions were doing
once, but we need to be doing it now. The message of Easter, the message of the
Passover, is to put into practice the
love of humanity. A humanity that is joining together to promote the things
that are needed in this world for our generation and those yet to come,
grounded on the messages of tolerance peace justice and so on. Sadly this world
needs those things still today and we need to be a new consciousness of this.
Let us be the resurrection and the life, Let us be a new consciousness
of the gift of life, Let us be all that
is needed to usher in more love peace and joy, with a compassion that brings
wholeness to all not just to some.
May it be so…
"'You can't sit anymore in churches
ReplyDeletelistening to stodgy liturgies,' [said Bishop Packard]. 'They put
you to sleep. Most of these churches are museums with floorshows.
They are a caricature of what Jesus intended. Jesus would be
turning over the money-changing tables in their vestibules. Those
in the church may be good-hearted and even well-meaning, but they
are ignoring the urgent, beckoning call to engage with the world.'"